Nuclear power contributes to one per cent. Electricity produced by atomic fission, that is, the splitting of atoms is one of the best utilizations of atomic energy. In a state like ours where electricity is used for all sorts of twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours activities, we need a safe, clean and low-cost beginning for it and atomic energy seems to be the reply for it. We depend on electricity for assorted intents and therefore we use about one tierce of our energy resources for the production of electricity.
Nuclear power industry has been developed during the last 50 years. Nowadays nuclear power has reached a certain technological maturity in many developed countries. The main criteria for power plants are to be a reliable, environmentally acceptable and safe source of electrical energy.
One of the most important tasks of any power plant is to develop energy services that minimize health and environmental impacts and at the same time best support development and improve the quality of life.
Over the past decades the nuclear power industry was considered to be the energy of the future. Today it is being questioned in many nations.
The most actual issues discussed by leaders of developed countries are safety of operations, non-proliferation, impact on public acceptance of nuclear power, waste disposal, using of advanced energy technologies to solve the problem of greenhouse effect, and many other issues.
World resources of uranium are widespread and can provide a sufficient nuclear fuel supply in the short and medium terms even with conventional thermal reactors, operating primarily on once-through cycles with disposal of spent fuel.
Nuclear power industry plays a vital role in the electricity supply systems and economies of many countries which state a desire to maintain nuclear as an energy choice for the future. Opponents of nuclear power state that nuclear waste poses an unsolvable problem whose consequences will be borne by future generations.
We consider that the proper management of radioactive waste must be based on the principle of protecting human health and environment.
However, we must recognize that the problem of the ultimate disposal of radioactive waste is still open, although some countries are close to its technical solution.
The small quantity of nuclear wastes is technically and economically helpful. The costs of radioactive wastes handling are very high. In the USA costs of low level waste disposal have increased dramatically.
Technological progress in nuclear power industry must emphasize safety obtained cost effectively and nuclear waste disposal must be pursued vigorously as the top priority concern. Highly radioactive wastes are to be handled with great care and are to be given safe storage.
The proper storage and disposal of nuclear waste require necessary technologies: Nowadays waste is mostly stored in temporary storage places, requiring constant maintenance. At the same time suitable permanent disposal methods are discussed.
Modern nuclear industry produces low-level radioactive waste in the form of contaminated items like clothing, hand tools, water purifier resins, and upon decomissioning the materials of which the reactor itself is built. Decommissioning expenditures usually include the following components: Thus, we can conclude that to meet its constantly increasing energy needs, the world must use not only all available energy sources but also advanced energy methods and technologies.
The problem of global warming is the most decisive force influencing the future development of nuclear power. We believe that nuclear power issues are closely connected with politics. Today we can notice the public disaffection with nuclear energy due to its association with nuclear weapons and the fear of catastrophes.
However, there is a significant achievement of the US nuclear power industry over the last twenty years increasing its operating efficiency with improved maintenance.Nuclear power is a promising alternate since it is a clean and comparatively safe beginning.
In this paper we have explored the pros and cons of this energy beginning. Contentss. Aug 23, · An Argumentative Essay “Use of Nuclear Energy: Safe or Not?” 23 Aug Most countries today are becoming more and more dependent on nuclear power as a source of energy because of its high energy output and the availability of uranium used for fuelling nuclear reactors that generate power to provide electricity in households.
More than 80 percent of the people who live in a 10 mile radius of nuclear power plants concur to develop nuclear energy because they know that nuclear plants are safe. In contrast, six thousand people die in coal mines each year, and a huge amount of people die by car accidents in the world (Moore n.p).
Nuclear energy is an efficient way to reduce the amount of CO2 in the environment. Nuclear energy saves of billion tonnes of CO2 if that same amount of energy was made from burning coal. Nuclear Power is a Safe and Reliable Alternative Essays Words 8 Pages Alternatives to oil, along with the other fossil fuels, have been gaining popularity in the wake of high prices and elevated awareness of global warming.
Essay on Nuclear Power: Dirty, Dangerous and Expensive - The energy industry is beginning to change. In today’s modern world, governments across the globe are shifting their focuses from traditional sources of power, like the burning coal and oil, to the more complex and scientific nuclear power supply.