Named for Julian Chavez, one of the first Los Angeles County Supervisors in the s, Chavez Ravine was a self-sufficient and tight-knit community, a rare example of small town life within a large urban metropolis. For decades, its residents ran their own schools and churches and grew their own food on the land.
From Tim Blair on FoxNews. My 11 years of experience in the editorial writing business lead me to strongly support your point about the counterproductive nature of Coulter-style rhetoric. When a writer advances arguments while refraining from impugning the integrity of those on the opposite side of an issue, that writer will build up capital among thoughtful readers.
That capital, in the form of reader respect, can later come in handy for a writer or a newspaper's editorial page staff when taking an unpopular or unexpected position. Matt Welch has had an interesting exchange with others, including Eve Kayden in her blog and Max Power in comments on Matt's blogabout people being afraid to speak their mind for various reasons.
Even setting aside the risk of lost business opportunities including losing one's jobhumans are gregarious creatures who highly value the esteem of their fellows. People don't want to be ostracized, or even condemned, as rude, foolish, ill-informed, or morally misguided.
This often leads people Chavez ravine essay refrain from speaking their minds. This is sometimes good, because it keeps people from saying things that are rude, foolish, ill-informed, and morally misguided; it often leads to fewer people people being insulted, and fewer false rumors and bad ideas being spread.
We take these benefits of "thinking twice before you speak" for granted, but they're very real; the world would be a worse place if people never thought of their listeners' reactions to what they say.
Of course, it's also sometimes bad. First, it sometimes suppresses speech that is accurate and important, but that is frowned upon by the majority -- or even a small minority. Second, it leads even some good beliefs to become unchallenged orthodoxy, and thus makes them much less powerful than they should be and would be if they were constantly challenged and rebutted John Stuart Mill's point.
This makes it very hard to make any really general statements about this tendency, except that it's sometimes good and sometimes bad. I think, for instance, that people should try to avoid calling this phenomenon by value-laden terms such as "self-censorship," since that suggests to many that it's always a bad thing.
One can fault or praise the phenomenon in specific situations, because of the specific aspects of these situations. For instance, if a law school community has a tendency to ostracize people who oppose race-based affirmative action, that's bad, because it deprives the community of a healthy debate.
On the other hand, if an astronomy department has a tendency to ostracize people who praise astrology, or call each other by racial epithets, or spread inaccurate or offensive rumors about each other's sex lives, that's probably good.
One item from my admittedly limited experience with this: One can often though not always diminish though not eliminate the adverse social effects from making certain ideological points, and it pays to think hard about this before either making one's point or deciding not to make it.
Having a thorough command of the facts and the argument helps. Pointing out the importance of the community -- especially an academic community -- being open to serious discussion helps.
Demonstrating to the audience that you're calm and reasonable, while the other side is shrill and intolerant of reasonable arguments, helps.
An obvious point, but I think an important and often-forgotten one. I call it "Be in their face, but with a breath mint. Yes, sometimes, especially when your job is on the line, you need to trim your sails to the prevailing winds -- that's life.
And, even when it's just social peace that's at stake, we need to choose our battles, and be understanding of those who have decided that discretion is the better part of valor. But especially for those of us who are fortunate to have some degree of social and professional security, there are times when we need to stop building our capital, and start spending some.
But maybe that's all the more reason why we should resolve to take some occasional social risks, realizing how comparatively tiny they really are. Maybe thinking how much others have risked to speak their minds -- once they had recognized, on mature reflection, that they were in fact right and the pressures arrayed against them were wrong -- should steel us to action in some of those times when silence seems the easier course.
Chris Suellentrop in Slate criticizes Carter's free-lance post-presidential diplomacy: Unlike John Quincy Adams and Theodore Roosevelt, ex-presidents who remained active in American politics after their terms expired, Carter has set himself up as separate from American politics.
He says he aims to work in areas where he doesn't interfere with the White House or the State Department.
But he has no problem interfering when it suits him. His efforts to end the trade embargo in Cuba may be laudable, for example. But Carter's position is at odds with the U. Brian Linse argues that the speech in the Nuremberg Files case was rightly punished, and links to an article by Prof.Chavez Ravine was a self-sufficient and tight-knit community, a rare example of small town life within a large urban metropolis, but no matter how much the inhabitants loved their home, their friends and family, they had to still had to leave.
Biggest Siterips, Pornstars and MDH Porn Archive. This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. In after being caught in the chaotic center of the "commie-queer" baiting scandal at Smith College and dubbed by the press as one of “the porn professors”, Joel Dorius could only find work teaching in Europe, far removed from the media scandal in the U.S.
Contending that Chavez Ravine was a slum -- an argument advanced by photographs that selectively depicted ramshackle structures and street patterns defying suburban norms -- the city called for the demolition of the entire community.
Cesar Chavez Essay; Cesar Chavez Essay. Chavez Ravine. Words | 8 Pages. first cities to receive the funds for project. Unfortunately, Chavez Ravine was one of the sites chosen for the housing project, so, to prepare for the construction work of the low-income apartments, the Housing Authority of Los Angeles had to convince the people of.
18 January -- Das Hexenrennen at leslutinsduphoenix.com day of skiing and photographing "witches" in all sorts of costumes sweeping down the slopes. Our favourite black piste was closed, but the blacks 2, 3 and 14 were open and garanteed a glorious adrenalin rush.