June was the month for strawberries, and some of my strawberries were jumbo size.
Support Aeon Donate now Philosophers periodically fret about the apparent lack of progress in their discipline. By discovering its methods and unifying a lot of us around them, science has figured out how to get human behaviours connected to the larger physical environment in ways that yield information about it, information that we can use to rocket off to the Moon or just bring pleasure to our ever-curious prefrontal cortex.
Philosophy, by comparison, seems to have little to brag about. A number of attempts have recently been made to dispel the fretting. And in Philosophical Progress: In Defence of a Reasonable OptimismDaniel Stoljar argues that although we return to the same philosophical topics time and again, the questions we ask about those topics change from one time to another, and are progressively being answered.
But all of them — mine will be another — face fundamental criticisms. Some propose that the whole idea of making progress toward the truth gets philosophy wrong.
Consider the latter time-honoured goal, for example. Whole ways of doing philosophy would have to be sent packing or provided with a new identity if that were not so.
As Aristotle says in the first sentence of his Metaphysics, all human beings by nature desire to understand. And it appears that not everything we want to understand is addressed by science.
As Carlos Fraenkel observes in his reply to Papineau, also in The Times Literary Supplement, the naturalistic worldview of many contemporary analytical philosophers is rather different from that of the Greeks, preventing what we do from contributing progressively improved enlargements on their themes.
This point is not decisive, however, since joint intellectual concerns — and thus the required continuity — can be discerned by moving to the most general level of investigation. Here we find what Stoljar calls philosophical topics.
In an online articlehe mentions three of them: In any case, Ancient Greek philosophy had its own naturalists, the pre-Socratic Atomists. And the idea of the Atomists that reality can be Many as well as One — though a response to ancient notions that we might regard as outlandish, and though it in part leads into modern physics — could easily come up for discussion in a modern course on metaphysics, given the interests and terms of debate currently found in that sub-field of philosophy.
The reference to modern physics reminds us of a commonly cited fact — that philosophy came first and gave birth to science — that could in its own way seem to delegitimise or quickly answer the progress question.
As David Chalmers points out in a paper that has generated considerable internet discussion, the Big Questions of philosophy tend to stay behind when the sciences leave home.
Tracing, with science, the innumerable causal pathways associated with our behaviours, philosophy wants to know whether these leave room for me to really be free and deserve praise or blame for my behaviour.
And if there are truths about how things ought to be as well as scientific truths about how things are, what are they and how are they discovered?
Might there be no truths of the former kind at all?The essay was a review of the early episodes of the new show that was also a review of a single joke contained within it. A joke that went, as Nussbaum retold it, like this.
A Conservationist Manifesto shows the crucial relevance of a conservation ethic at a time of mounting concern about global climate change, depletion of natural resources, extinction of species, and the economic inequities between rich and poor nations. David Suzuki's A Planet for the Taking In the essay "A Planet for the Taking," David Suzuki describes Canadians' odd appreciation for this great natural bounty we call our own.
He is an internationally acclaimed scientist who is . Planet B, the duo of punk artist Justin Pearson and hip-hop producer Luke Henshaw, have s 0 comments Read» Light In The Attic Announces Japanese Ambient Compilation Light In The Attic has announced details of a compilation collecting music from a number 0 comments Read».
In addition, review essay abstracts should list the texts to be discussed and note the broader thematic issues to be explored in the essay.
On the basis of the submitted abstract, the editors will determine whether a full article/essay should be submitted. Turnaround for abstracts will generally be two weeks.
Gizmag is now New Atlas. Extraordinary ideas moving the world forward.